“
Our public face sets the course of DH, via whom it entices to engage with us, how it informs policy agendas and funding allocations, and who gets inspired to be the next generation of digital humanities.”
At ADHO conferences 2006 - 2020
At ADHO conferences 2015 - 2020
At ADHO conferences 2006 - 2020
2006 - 2020: authors affiliated to 1,351 different institutions in 80 countries.
2000 - 2015: the gender gap @ ADHO, between representation, partecipation and bias.
“
A woman has just as much chance of getting a paper through peer review as a man if they both submit a presentation on the same topic (e.g., both women and men have a 72 percent chance of passing peer review if they write about network analysis, or 65% of passing peer review if they write about knowledge representation), but topics that are heveliy gendered toward women are less likely to be accepted. Cultural studies has a 57 percent acceptance rate, gender studies 60 percent, pedagogy 51 percent. Male-skewed topics have higher accenpance rates, like text analysis (83 percent), programming (80 percent), or Asian studies (79 percent).”
bit.ly/slides_dh20
Link to this interactive presentation so that you can view it at yuor own pace and interact with the visualizations.
(refresh slide if charts don't appear immediately).
http://bit.ly/python_dh20
Link to the Python notebook used to work with the DH Conference Index full dataset in preparation for this presentation.
http://bit.ly/github_dh20
Link to the Github repo with all the code, input .CSV files and the output .CSV files used for the visualizations contained in this presentation.
http://bit.ly/references_dh20
Full reference list of articles, paper and projects upon which this presentation is built.